Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Pentax DSLRs LCD Hood / Loupe.  (Read 1469 times)
Yvon Bourque
Yvon Bourque
Supporter
Full Member
*

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 151



WWW
« on: October 09, 2007, 12:12:57 PM »

I found and bought an LCD Hood / Loupe at around $69.00. it’s one of the best gadget I found in a long time to help rid of unwanted glare and at the same time, allowing viewing adjustment to your particular eyesight. It's made by Hoodman USA.  Anybody else used it?  I wrote my impression of it on this blog: http://pentaxdslrs.blogsp...e-camera-lcd-screens.html

Are there better hoods or loupes that  the Hoodman's HoodLoupe?

* H-LPP.gif (51.04 KB - downloaded 25 times.)
Logged

KhoKing
Administrator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 17
Offline Offline

Posts: 2656



WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2007, 12:28:41 PM »

Hi Yvon,

What is the magnification of the loupe? Can you still view the LCD in full?
Logged
Yvon Bourque
Yvon Bourque
Supporter
Full Member
*

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 151



WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2007, 12:35:52 PM »

There is actually negative magnification, or simply put, a slight wide angle effect. What I was impressed with is that not only it covers the screen from sun light and reflection, it also has a diopter adjustment. I don't know why it took so long for someone to come up with this ingenious approach. I personnally love it.

* H-LPP.gif (51.04 KB - downloaded 12 times.)
Logged

KhoKing
Administrator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 17
Offline Offline

Posts: 2656



WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2007, 12:41:14 PM »

Hi Yvon,

If the main purpose is to view under bright day to get some shade, then I actually prefer the foldable LCD hood, which can be attached permanently to your DSLR and fold down when not in use.

Here's an photo of a Nikon version LCD hood, there should be one for PENTAX as well. Smiley



Price is much cheaper as well at 1/3rd of the LCD loupe. Tongue
Logged

Yours truly,
Kho King
PENTAXWORLD Founder & Administrator
ShaShinKi Founder ~ Online Camera Shop!
PhotoMalaysia Co-Founder
KhoKing
Administrator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 17
Offline Offline

Posts: 2656



WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2007, 12:42:43 PM »

Another thought on the LCD loupe.

If you have to use one hand to hold the loupe, the other hand to hold the DSLR, then it would be difficult to browse/go to next photo on the DSLR...no? Tongue
Logged
Yvon Bourque
Yvon Bourque
Supporter
Full Member
*

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 151



WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2007, 02:57:12 PM »

The loop does not let any light in and the view of the LCD is extraordinary. I found that holding the camera with my left hand and pushing the camera toward me a little forces the loupe to stay in place, stucked between the camera and my right eye. It is then easy to scroll from picture to picture or zooming in and out with my right hand. It's hard to explain how easy it is to use without trying it yourself. I had a hood like you describe above and I personnally did not like it. I use the Diopter adjustment on the K10D for my specific "less-than-perfect" vision. However, when viewing the screen, I can't see the results clearly without glasses, and that's where the Hoodloupe excels. It isolate the LCD from any stray light while having the capability to adjust to your own unique eyesight.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2007, 03:00:30 PM by Yvon Bourque » Logged

KhoKing
Administrator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 17
Offline Offline

Posts: 2656



WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2007, 04:42:50 PM »

Hi Yvon,

Good point. Having the loupe not letting any light in is definitely better and give more vibrant viewing than just the LCD hood.
Logged
Mike Pearson
Administrator
Elite Member
*

Rating: 13
Online Online

Posts: 4580



WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2007, 10:40:00 PM »

Yvon,

I have the Hoodman Loupe and it is awesome. I use it consistently outside and I have used it on my Epson P2000 even though it doesn't cover the full screen. Hoodman also do what looks to be a very good right-angle finder and I intend to have a good look at that.

Mike
Logged

K20D, K100D, Optio RZ10, Optio M50, MZ6, FA 28-105 AL IF, FA 50 f/1.4, DA 35 f/2.8 Limited, DA 70 f/2.4 Limited, DA 16-45 ED, DA 50-200 ED, DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED, Sigma 105 f/2.8 EX Macro, Pentax AF-360FGZ, AF-540FGZ.
Yvon Bourque
Yvon Bourque
Supporter
Full Member
*

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 151



WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2007, 02:02:46 AM »

Yvon,

 Hoodman also do what looks to be a very good right-angle finder and I intend to have a good look at that.

Mike

Mike, I have the right angle finder. I haven't bought from Hoodman but it is the same unit manufactured in China. You can buy it on Ebay directly from China at around $39.00. That makes a big difference when shooting macro, like I noticed you do quite often with butterflies. Get one. These small intem make as much impact on your protography as a new lens...and much cheaper.

Regards,

Yvon
Logged
Mike Pearson
Administrator
Elite Member
*

Rating: 13
Online Online

Posts: 4580



WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2007, 04:55:43 AM »

Yvon,

Many thanks for the info. - by the way I love my K100D book.

Mike
Logged

K20D, K100D, Optio RZ10, Optio M50, MZ6, FA 28-105 AL IF, FA 50 f/1.4, DA 35 f/2.8 Limited, DA 70 f/2.4 Limited, DA 16-45 ED, DA 50-200 ED, DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED, Sigma 105 f/2.8 EX Macro, Pentax AF-360FGZ, AF-540FGZ.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal 1.0 RC1 | © 2005-2010 BlocWeb